backgroundbackground

The Financial Developer's Guide to APIs: REST vs. WebSocket

featured image

Financial data powers everything from retirement accounts to lightning-fast trading algorithms. Behind the scenes, APIs (Application Programming Interfaces) are the unsung heroes that move this data between systems. If you're building financial applications, you'll likely face a choice between two major API types: REST and WebSocket.

Let's break down what makes each tick and when you might reach for one over the other.

REST APIs: The Reliable Workhorse

Think of REST APIs as the postal service of the digital world. You send a letter (request), and sometime later, you get a response. They've become the backbone of web development for good reason—they're intuitive and fit neatly into how we already build websites and apps.

What makes REST tick?

REST APIs use familiar HTTP methods like GET and POST. When you want yesterday's closing stock price, your app makes a GET request to an endpoint like /stocks/AAPL/history, and back comes your data, typically wrapped in JSON or XML.

Each request is independent, like separate letters in the mail. This makes REST predictable and easy to debug—perfect for when you're building your first financial app.

Where REST shines in finance

REST APIs are particularly useful for:

  • Fetching historical market data for analysis
  • Pulling quarterly earnings reports
  • Retrieving account balances at day's end
  • Grabbing economic indicators that update infrequently

The beauty of REST is that you don't need to be a coding wizard to implement it. Plus, since each request stands alone, servers can cache responses, keeping things zippy when multiple users need the same data.

WebSocket APIs: The Real-Time Responder

Now imagine having a phone call instead of sending letters. That's essentially what WebSocket does—it establishes an ongoing connection where both parties can speak whenever they need to. For financial applications where seconds (or milliseconds) matter, this approach is a game-changer.

How WebSocket works its magic

Unlike REST's call-and-response pattern, WebSocket creates a persistent connection. Once established, data flows freely in both directions without the overhead of new connection handshakes for each interaction.

When a stock price changes, the server immediately pushes that update to all connected clients. No waiting, no asking—it just appears.

When WebSocket makes sense

WebSocket proves invaluable for:

  • Live market data feeds that can't afford delays
  • Trading interfaces where orders need instant confirmation
  • Interactive charts that update as markets move
  • Notifications about price thresholds or market events

The immediacy of WebSocket creates a much more dynamic experience. Users can watch their investments respond to market movements in real-time, making them feel more connected to their financial decisions.

Choosing Your API: It's About the Job at Hand

So which should you use? Like most programming decisions, it depends on what you're building.

REST makes perfect sense when:

  • You're building a retirement calculator that uses end-of-day prices
  • Your users check their account balances occasionally
  • You're analyzing historical market trends
  • You're just getting started with financial programming

WebSocket becomes worth the extra complexity when:

  • Users expect instantaneous market data
  • Your application involves active trading
  • You need to push alerts the moment conditions change
  • Performance and immediacy are selling points for your app

Real-World Challenges

Both approaches come with their share of headaches. With REST, servers can buckle under the weight of clients repeatedly polling for updates. It's like having hundreds of people calling your phone every minute to ask "Any news?" Even with caching, this creates unnecessary traffic.

WebSocket, while powerful, demands more server resources to maintain all those open connections. Development teams sometimes need to completely rethink their infrastructure when WebSocket connections scale beyond initial expectations.

Security considerations also differ. REST has well-established security patterns, while WebSocket requires careful implementation of protocols like WSS (WebSocket Secure) to protect sensitive financial data.

Putting It All Together

Consider two different financial applications:

For a personal finance app that helps users track their long-term investments, REST is often the perfect fit. Users might check in weekly at most, and the app mainly shows historical performance and projections. The simplicity of REST makes development straightforward, and such apps can perform beautifully even during end-of-month peaks when everyone checks their statements.

In contrast, a day-trading platform requires users to see price movements instantly and place orders without delay. WebSocket implementation, despite the additional development complexity, delivers results worth the effort. Users can react to market shifts the moment they happen, creating a much more engaging experience.

The Bottom Line

Understanding both REST and WebSocket APIs gives you flexibility as a financial developer. Rather than treating them as competitors, think of them as different tools in your toolkit. Many sophisticated financial applications actually use both—REST for less time-sensitive operations and WebSocket where immediacy matters. By matching the right API to each job, you'll build financial applications that perform efficiently and give users exactly what they need, when they need it.

Stay up to date with the latest FinFeedAPI news

By subscribing to our newsletter, you accept our website terms and privacy policy.

Recent Articles

Get your free API key now and start building in seconds!